Tuesday, December 25, 2007

Series: The Death of Morality--Gentlewoman

Ever wonder why the word “Gentlewoman” never truly caught on? It is because the word “woman” itself implied gentlewomanly manners (unless otherwise stated), thus making the actual “Gentlewoman” superfluous. And, yet with the birth of 20th century, it became imperative to create newer labels for the rapidly changing notion of what it was to be a woman. Thus words along the lines of “slut, whore, etc” became mainstream as looseness of behavior began skyrocketing the more women gained freedom of thought and expression.

So shouldn’t these past eras (WW1, WW2, the groovy 60s, etc) be labeled more as eras of Amorality? Not quite. Sure they set the trend for future behavior, but only in recent years have such negative labels actually been re-classified under “cool” category. Yes, girls don’t go boldly proclaiming, “I am a slut!” but their conduct all but accounts for their lack of vocal announcement. And everything in society is encouraging them to continue their behavior. Go to the “Juniors” section of a clothing store, and it is tough to find jeans that actually embrace one’s waist instead of slipping off of one’s hips; go to the magazine section of the local bookstore, and one sees cover pages worshipping teen role models who have just recently gotten pregnant or exposed themselves on the ubiquitous Internet. Furthermore, Daddy’s little girls who grow up in such a society only worsen when put against the pressures of adulthood.

With this in mind, I dive again into the crazy water-hole, now assessing this adult Woman of the 21st century and measuring just how far the apple has fallen from the tree of the “Gentlewoman” of yesteryear.

There are usually two types of women that one encounters at the water-hole: The Queens and The Greens. The former are women who realize their power with men and utilize it with relish while the latter are usually jealous (thus, green) of the former group and will do anything just to get male attention. Despite their physical and mental difference, both groups find agreement on one issue: They both dreadfully want men. Nothing wrong in that thought—women since the birth of time have wanted men and a good part of their actions have been driven by how much they can impress this strapping, strong counterpart. They just had an extra ingredient: Restraint.

Entering the water-hole on a normal night, the woman (be it a Queen or a Green) quickly scans the area, trying to gauge just how many eyes are on HER. She lives for the attention, devours it, and wishes to remember it come next morning so she can brag about it to her girlfriends. She knows she has spent hours in her bathroom getting ready and wishes that her perseverance doesn’t go unnoticed. Acting nonchalant (or trying to), she casually makes her way to the bar. But she doesn’t order—no not just yet. Now she finally looks around, first along the bar and then a bit beyond, trying to catch the eye of a stranger who is willing to spend good money to buy another stranger a drink. If she succeeds (branding her a Queen), she mentally adds the drink to her ongoing “drink tally” for the night; if she doesn’t (a Green) she’ll buy herself a little something and move on to the Dance Floor.

No Restraint. No Control. No Shame. That denotes the Dance Floor of the 21st century water-hole. Here, the Green, will gyrate to her maximum capability, pumping her chest out, twirling her ass, all for the sake of a stranger’s attention. The night ends triumphantly for she is finally asked her number by the guy she was grinding with. The irony of the whole situation comes out when during the day, she proclaims her disgust that women are looked on as purely sexual objects while here, night after night, she is desperately putting herself up for sale.

That women of this Era are liberated is true. But too much of ANYthing is harmful.

Personal Insight: What does the word “Gentlewoman” mean to me? Most people misinterpret this term as well its other synonyms (ladylike) as negative words. To them, these terms imply docile, submissive women that are imprisoned by society and men alike. I, being the child of the free era, take the term in a more positive light—to me it is the feminine counterpart of the male “Gentleman.” Now since it is proven that “men are from Mars, and women from Venus,” there will be stereotypical differences between the meanings. After all, women are not expected to hold the car door open so men can gracefully get inside. Accordingly, a Gentlewoman of the 21st century is one that is financially independent and mentally astute. She holds herself with dignity, displays modesty, lacks vulgarity, and above all, is fairly impervious to the alluring underbelly of society. That is not to say that she lives a sheltered, veiled life but rather a life where she upholds a laudable moral code. Note, sexual restraint, to me, does not determine if a woman is morally sound. In fact, it just tells me that a woman is Nun and thus chaste. Women still have the same animalistic desire, albeit, much toned down when compared to that of men. Sexual promiscuity, on the other hand, is what determines this distinction between a moral vs. and immoral woman.

Do I view myself as one of the last standing examples of this evasive “Gentlewoman”? Yes, as a matter of fact, I do. And trust me, there are a few others too :)

Next topic: Love

9 comments:

Diwant Vaidya said...

Post makes you think. I have not really put together what makes a "gentlewoman" for me. I think if you refer to the origins of "Gentleman" as the princes and nobility of renaissance, "Gentlewoman", then, must be an emulation of the female royalty of the time. Powdered wigs apart, much of what we imagine those women to be is what I feel we expect to see in present day "Gentlewomen".

Anonymous said...

Truly, I don't really think that women are any different than they have been throughout the years. Countless of stories and our history revolve around women who use whatever power they have to get the men they want. All women desire attention, for that attention is what makes them feel more confident in themselves..which is kind of sad. But regardless, receiving attention does make one feel better about the person they are. Stories tend to paint an image to us, where everything is perfect, the guy is a a gentlemen and the lady is ladylike, but reality isn't like that. I'm sure that the men and women you are describing surely did exist back in those times as well, they just aren't told in stories. Who wants to hear about the lady who slept with a random guy she met one night?
The thing with the 21st century is that the "water-hole" creates the setting for women and men to meet. Why do people dress up when going to places like that? Because they desire that attention, but not everyone is like that. For instance, I know, from personal experience that my friends and I (including you) are not like that. You get all types of people wherever you go. The waterhole provides people with the excuse to act differently than they would in any other setting (the booze, music, sketchy people lol).
Anyways, things haven't changed throughout the years...no, but the degree to where men and women act towards each other has changed..and the respect they have for each other has changed.

I enjoy reading your blog..I WANT TO SEE MORE!!!

Jim J said...

Interesting insights once again Isha! While I agree with your overall comments there are a few things I would say. While I don’t think it's intentional, it does seem like you are seeking to contrast an ideal past with a troubled present. However as I think you know, such an ideal past probably did not exist. While the majority of the population probably had greater restraint than the majority do at present, it would certainly be inaccurate to suggest that everyone did. It is also worth considering why they had such restraint. How much of it emerged from their personal morals and how much of was a result of societal norms and a fear of the consequences of breaching these? (and what is the nature of the relationship between the two). I suspect that it was a combination of both and depended on the person but the answer to that question is probably important for the argument that you are trying to make.

By focusing on the concept of restraint you highlight something that I do think has diminished greatly in modern society...... and not just when it comes to sex. There is a much wider issue regarding personal self control in all aspects of life. Essentially it could be argued that people have become more selfish and self centred than ever before. Whether it is sex, the latest fashions or the coolest sports cars, many people appear to have become obsessed with the idea that they can have anything they want, anytime they want it, regardless of the consequences. This self centred pursuit of happiness has implications for the indivual themselves (especially if they don't get what they want or if there are unintended consequences to their actions), for others and for the planet that we live on.

Another issue is probably the concept of respect. I think for previous generations, the idea of respecting themselves (and their own bodies) and respecting others was either much more important or meant something totally different to what it does to many people today.

One other thing…. You seem to suggest that almost everyone who visits the “watering hole” is engaged in the pursuit of immediate sex. While this may be partly true, there are many other reasons why people may attend bars and clubs. They also provide an environment for many other forms of social interaction (perhaps more so in other societies than in the US). I’m thinking here of Ireland, where the watering hole can be a place for friends and neighbours to meet for a chat and a few drinks, to meet new people, as well as a place to meet people of the opposite sex. However I have just presented an idealised image of the Irish pub and I do think there are very very serious issues with the “pub culture” and attitudes to alcohol in Ireland but that’s a whole other debate.

Isha said...

YourLover: I agree with your comments, and like I said, the fact that male attention is primary in the minds of most women is unfortunate as then most of their actions are controlled on how they would appear to the opposite sex. In this manner, individuality gives way to clones, and independent thought become but a mere figment.

Jim, you make some very insightful, interesting comments and I agree with all of them. Lol, maybe you should write a blog too?

Now, I do contrast troubled present to an ideal version of the past. Obviously, people haven't changed in thought from the ones back then but society as a whole has. While the people of today do have morals, they feel and do get away with just about anything. These days, a 16yr old girl gets pregnant and a good half of the society asks, "what's wrong in that?" Times have become more lax and excuses plenty--no one is a bad sheep anymore--you do drugs, you're cool; you sleep around, you're a player. And I feel that due to this, our society will soon come to a point where good will merge with bad and there truly won't be a clear definition of "morality," which itself will be dead. And that will give way to utter debaseness where emotions become trivial as people's actions will then be controlled by one goal only: Self-happiness. Like you mention, one of the crucial differences between the past and presence is this self-love that is increasing...Think of yourself first, then others. Now, although, our society does have examples like Bill Gates and W.Buffett who are sacrificing their financial assests for the betterment of the world, we also have equally famous examples like Paris Hilton, Lohan, and Spears, who are using their money for self-pleasure. And its a sad state as these girls have the most influence on the upcoming younger generations--who now think it so cool to be a party girl and go out drinking.

Innocence has died. I think that thought bugs me the most. I read "The Brave New World" in 11th grade and it highlighted my fears in the most poignant manner. Huxley was not totally incorrect in stating that our future looks bleak (moralistically) where even the young 'uns are encouraged to date, etc and grow up at a faster rate than their mental growth into maturity.

Regarding the watering-hole, I suppose I should've been more specific in defining what kind I meant. I am aware of the European "Pub culture" that you mention and in my mind, I relate it to the cozy "Coffee house culture" in America. Its a much more relaxed atmosphere, where the object is to mainly chat (as opposed to scream), and lounge lazily sipping your drink on one of the chairs provided (as opposed to dancing to LOUD music while spilling your drink). The "watering-hole" in my account is more of the type described in the parentheses, where the main idea discard your 'day-self' and follow the Las Vegas motto: "everything that happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas." It is at such places that people truly loose their inhibitions and more often than not, descend into their Animal selves.

Mihir Pathare said...

Yes, I still do visit your blog regularly, in hopes of a new post. :)

Anonymous said...

new post!!!!

Mayank kedia said...

@isha -- when u say -" now every one is selfish " etc... the point u are missing is -- i think everyone should be selfish absolutely selfish --
i mean you give examples of bill gates and W buffet -- they do all the charity you are reffering to -- mainly as a source of personal satisfaction -- and thats not wrong in anyway -- but sure is selfish.. but the trouble with the world is that nobody knows whats they enjoy the most :P...

Anonymous said...

time for a new post sometime soon maybe? i'm waiting.....i can't wait any longerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Anonymous said...

NEW POST ASAP